Blog Layout

Firms must embrace innovation first

Mark Dodgson AO

Australia needs to change its business culture. Science and research provide new opportunities and governments can facilitate greater activity, but innovation performance in Australia and elsewhere depends on actions in business.

Most innovation in every nation happens in firms. Australian businesses have a mixed record in innovation – the application of new ideas to advantage. We have some outstanding successes, for example, in parts of the mining, food and health industries, in some service sectors and amongst technology start-ups. However, we simply do not have enough of them to rebalance the economy in the face of the challenges that lie ahead for Australia. Too many boards of directors are sclerotic, compliance-orientated, risk-averse and unaware of the nature and importance of innovation. Too many firms, large and small, lack the management skills to use innovation to survive and thrive in a highly competitive and increasingly challenging world.


Amid the re-assessments taking place as a result of COVID-19, there is a priceless opportunity for Australian businesses to rethink how innovation is managed and, more fundamentally, reassess its nature and purpose. The global pandemic has shaken economies to their core and disturbed the social status quo. Factoring in ongoing political turmoil and the climate crisis, conditions are prime for a fundamental reset of innovation in business. 


What do we know?

The findings of research into innovation during the past 70 years have been unambiguous. Innovative businesses live longer, grow more and generate larger profits. Innovation is risky and failures are inevitable, but failure to innovate is the greater risk. 


Innovation is found across a wide range of activities: in new products and services, operations and production, organisational structures, paths to market and business models. Innovative firms adopt portfolio approaches, with the bulk of activity devoted to incremental changes, a proportion directed towards more substantial initiatives, and a small element designed to explore future options. Even the most innovative firms do not innovate by themselves: collaboration is crucial – with suppliers, customers, other firms and research institutions. Successful firms have effective processes in place to manage innovation, including in R&D and new product and service development, linking them with business objectives. Innovation strategies are core elements in the master plans of successful firms.


The best-run innovative firms have supportive governance structures, typically involving board-level responsibility for innovation, regular reporting on performance and clear and consistent articulation by leaders on the importance of investment in innovation. Such firms percolate the understanding that innovation is everyone’s responsibility, encourage employees to get excited about new ideas, and circumvent obstacles to change, often found in the permafrost of middle-management.


What is new?

Firms are having to navigate the turbulence created by the pandemic, threats to global trade and institutions, political and social polarisation, and disruptive technological change. They are adjusting to progressive movements such as Me Too and Black Lives Matter, and to a majority-Millennial workforce with evolved expectations of the working life. In this fluid environment, firms have the opportunity to rethink the very nature of business.


Pre-COVID-19, moves were afoot to rethink the purpose of business amid growing evidence that addressing societal issues and stakeholders’ priorities helps produce long-term value. A new approach to innovation has to be part of this reformation. Groups such as the US Business Roundtable of leading CEOs have questioned the singular pursuit of shareholder value, as opposed to creating value for stakeholders including employees, customers, suppliers and the broader community. The World Economic Forum’s "Great Reset" is marshalling support for a fundamental reset of the foundations of the economic and social system for a more equitable, sustainable and resilient future. The Great Reset provides a framework for the rethinking and reshaping of business purpose and behaviour. Australian businesses need to lead and manage innovation in this new context.


What is to be done?

Australian firms have to rethink and reset their innovation strategies, processes and practices in the light of new circumstances. This would involve deliberation on what has worked in the past and what might work better in an uncertain future. It requires the search for new opportunities and the astute application of new approaches, including novel governance arrangements, different organisational structures and the introduction of more appropriate metrics of performance.


Universities have a role to play in creating new options for the future, though business schools would need to undergo deep-seated change if they’re to contribute significantly. Viewed by vice-chancellors primarily as ATMs full of student fees, and with many staff wedded to producing meaningless academic articles, these schools need to prioritise collaborative research with firms, helping to deliver insights into the new environment. Training imperatives need to shift towards fostering skills in innovation and entrepreneurship. Firms, in turn, need to commit to supporting and working with externally-orientated and business-savvy academics.


Most fundamentally, and in line with thought leaders such as the World Economic Forum, businesses need to be more open and engaging with their stakeholders. Rather than being hailed as a positive, innovation is often associated with job losses, insecurity and increased workloads. The language of innovation – change, flexibility, agility, adaptability – needs to be applied beyond the confines of business efficiency to articulate the very purpose of business. Firms need to emphasise innovation’s value in improving quality of life and creating meaningful work, as well as reducing social inequality and cultivating environmental sustainability.


We need more and better information on the working conditions of those making, delivering and warehousing goods, and on the environmental cost of their manufacture and transportation. There needs to be an explosion in the crowdsourcing and crowdfunding of innovations and in the testing and prototyping of new ideas in hackathons, accelerators and incubators. 


Greater diversity in design teams is required. What else? We need new educational and training programs, from those that encourage more females and minorities into careers in technology and innovation, to those that stimulate solutions across social and environmental causes. A greater diversity of voices has to be heard, not only on what innovations are needed but on how they are to be created. Innovation thrives in workplaces that embrace inclusion, playfulness, happiness and fulfilment.


There is no future in doing business in the same old ways. There is a different future awaiting, potentially a better one for all. By finetuning their innovation strategies, businesses can help make this one possible future a reality.




Mark Dodgson AO is professor of Innovation Studies at the University of Queensland Business School, and visiting professor at Imperial College London. He has written or edited 18 books on innovation, and over 100 articles and book chapters, and has researched and taught innovation in more than 60 countries.



This article is taken from the recently published digital book

Australia's Nobel Laureates Vol III State of our Innovation Nation: 2021 and Beyond

click here

By By Harley Paroulaksis, CEO Paspalis, CEO Darwin Innovation Hub 20 May, 2023
Getting asked what we look for in deals is one of the most common questions I get as an investment manager.
20 May, 2023
The Small Business Association of Australia is dedicated to supporting SMEs, acting as their voice to government and helping them connect, grow, and prosper well into the future.
By By Shiv Meka 20 May, 2023
Sensibles may sound like science fiction, but this revolutionary technology is making waves in aged-care facilities, and has the potential to transform health monitoring at scale.
28 Mar, 2023
Alice Springs and the deserts of Central Australia don’t sound like a food basket, but they are for businesswoman and bush foods innovator Rayleen Brown.
By Gillian Cumming 28 Mar, 2023
A new report aims to lay the foundations for a deeper and more meaningful and equitable relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in the mining transition sector.
By Dr Saraid Billiards - CEO of the Association of Australian Medical Research Institutes. 27 Mar, 2023
If the health and medical research sector in Australia is to move forward, it must address gender equity, diversity, and inclusion- which means making the sector a safe and inclusive workspace for all.
27 Jan, 2023
A ground-breaking sheep technology system is bettering the businesses and lives of Australian sheep breeders thanks to a revolutionary combination of software, hardware, and support never before combined into one cohesive unit.
27 Jan, 2023
ANCA took an early view to look beyond Australia’s shores whilst developing advanced manufacturing technologies now viewed as ‘business as usual’
By Andrew Downs 27 Jan, 2023
As Australia grapples with a critical skills shortage, many are now encouraging young people to embrace a career in the trades, where a wealth of opportunities awaits.
By By Ben Kehoe 27 Jan, 2023
In 2016 I published a blog article titled Moonshots for Australia: 7 For Now. It’s one of many I have posted on business and innovation in Australia. In that book, I highlighted a number of Industries of the Future among a number of proposed Moonshots. I self-published a book, Innovation in Australia – Creating prosperity for future generations, in 2019, with a follow-up COVID edition in 2020. There is no doubt COVID is causing massive disruption. Prior to COVID, there was little conversation about National Sovereignty or supply chains. Even now, these topics are fading, and we remain preoccupied with productivity and jobs! My motivation for this writing has been the absence of a coherent narrative for Australia’s business future. Over the past six years, little has changed. The Australian ‘psyche’ regarding our political and business systems is programmed to avoid taking a long-term perspective. The short-term nature of Government (3 to 4-year terms), the short-term horizon of the business system (driven by shareholder value), the media culture (infotainment and ‘gotcha’ games), the general Australian population’s cynical perspective and a preoccupation with a lifestyle all create a malaise of strategic thinking and conversation. Ultimately, it leads to a leadership vacuum at all levels. In recent years we have seen the leadership of some of our significant institutions failing to live up to the most basic standards, with Royal Commissions, Inquiries and investigations consuming excessive time and resources. · Catholic Church and other religious bodies · Trade Unions · Banks (and businesses generally, take casinos, for example) · the Australian Defence Force · the Australian cricket teams · our elected representatives and the staff of Parliament House As they say, “A fish rots from the head!” At best, the leadership behaviour in those institutions could be described as unethical and, at worst….just bankrupt! In the last decade, politicians have led us through a game of “leadership by musical chairs” – although, for now, it has stabilised. However, there is still an absence of a coherent narrative about business and wealth creation. It is a challenge. One attempt to provide such a narrative has been the Intergenerational Reports produced by our federal Government every few years since 2002. The shortcomings of the latest Intergenerational Report Each Intergenerational Report examines the long-term sustainability of current government policies and how demographic, technological, and other structural trends may affect the economy and the budget over the next 40 years. The fifth and most recent Intergenerational Report released in 2021 (preceded by Reports in 2002, 2007, 2010 and 2015) provides a narrative about Australia’s future – in essence, it is an extension of the status quo. The Report also highlights three key insights: 1. First, our population is growing slower and ageing faster than expected. 2. The Australian economy will continue to grow, but slower than previously thought. 3. While Australia’s debt is sustainable and low by international standards, the ageing of our population will pressure revenue and expenditure. However, its release came and went with a whimper. The recent Summit on (what was it, Jobs and Skills and productivity?) also seems to have made the difference of a ‘snowflake’ in hell in terms of identifying our long-term challenges and growth industries. Let’s look back to see how we got here and what we can learn. Australia over the last 40 years During Australia’s last period of significant economic reform (the late 1980s and early 1990s), there was a positive attempt at building an inclusive national narrative between Government and business. Multiple documents were published, including: · Australia Reconstructed (1987) – ACTU · Enterprise Bargaining a Better Way of Working (1989) – Business Council of Australia · Innovation in Australia (1991) – Boston Consulting Group · Australia 2010: Creating the Future Australia (1993) – Business Council of Australia · and others. There were workshops, consultations with industry leaders, and conferences across industries to pursue a national microeconomic reform agenda. Remember these concepts? · global competitiveness · benchmarking · best practice · award restructuring and enterprising bargaining · training, management education and multiskilling. This agenda was at the heart of the business conversation. During that time, the Government encouraged high levels of engagement with stakeholders. As a result, I worked with a small group of training professionals to contribute to the debate. Our contribution included events and publications over several years, including What Dawkins, Kelty and Howard All Agree On – Human Resources Strategies for Our Nation (published by the Australian Institute of Training and Development). Unfortunately, these long-term strategic discussions are nowhere near as prevalent among Government and industry today. The 1980s and 1990s were a time of radical change in Australia. It included: · floating the $A · deregulation · award restructuring · lowering/abolishing tariffs · Corporatisation and Commercialisation Ross Garnaut posits that the reforms enabled Australia to lead the developed world in productivity growth – given that it had spent most of the 20th century at the bottom of the developed country league table. However, in his work, The Great Reset, Garnaut says that over the next 20 years, our growth was attributable to the China mining boom, and from there, we settled into “The DOG days” – Australia moved to the back of a slow-moving pack! One unintended consequence of opening our economy to the world is the emasculation of the Australian manufacturing base. The manic pursuit of increased efficiency, lower costs, and shareholder value meant much of the labour-intensive work was outsourced. Manufacturing is now less than 6% of our GDP , less than half of what it was 30 years ago!
More Posts
Share by: